[1] See Article 3
[2] See Article 2(3)
[3]See Article 22(8)
[4] See Article 3(2)
[5] See Article 4(5)
[6] See Article 12(3)
[7] Goodwin-Gill, Guy S., and Jane McAdam. The Refugee in International Law, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2021.
[8] As amended by the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.
[9] Lauterpacht, S., & Bethlehem, D. (2003). The scope and content of the principle of Non-refoulement: Opinion. In E. Feller, V. Türk, & F. Nicholson (Eds.), Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection (pp. 87-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493973.008
[10] See Article I(1) of the 1967 Protocol.
[11] Lauterpacht, S., & Bethlehem, D. (2003) op cit.
[12] Articles on State Responsibility adopted by the International Law Commission (ILC) of the United Nations on the 31st of May, 2001.
[13] Salvador Commercial Company, UNRIAA, vol. XV (Sales No. 66.V.3), p. 455, at p. 477 (1902) cited in Articles on State Responsibility op cit.
[14] Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1999, p. 62, cited in Articles on State Responsibility op cit.
[15] League of Nations, Conference for the Codification of International Law, Bases of Discussion for the Conference drawn up by the Preparatory Committee, vol. III: Responsibility of States for Damage caused in their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners (document C.75.M.69.1929.V) cited in Articles on State Responsibility op cit.
[16] See Articles on State Responsibility op cit.
[17]See Allain, J. (2001). The Jus Cogens Nature of Non-Refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law, 13, 533-558.
[18] 1980 (Executive Committee—31st Session). No. 17 (XXXI) PROBLEMS OF EXTRADITION. AFFECTING REFUGEES paras. (b)–(e)
[19] See Lauterpacht et al; op cit. pg. 112
[20] Ibid.
[21] For a detailed discussion of this, see Lauterpacht et al; op cit.; See also UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), The Principle of Non-Refoulement as a Norm of Customary International Law. Response to the Questions Posed to UNHCR by the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany in Cases 2 BvR 1938/93, 2 BvR 1953/93, 2 BvR 1954
[22] see Article I(2)
[23] See Trevisanut, Dr. Seline; “International Law and Practice: The Principle of Non-Refoulement and the De-Territorialization of Border Control at Sea”. Leiden Journal of International Law. (September 1, 2014) 27 (3): 661. doi:10.1017/S0922156514000259. S2CID 145445428
[24] See also Article 31 of the 1951 Convention.
[25] For an extensive discussion on this, See Lauterpacht et al; op cit. pg. 123-127
[26] See Goodwin-Gill, Guy S., and Jane McAdam. The Refugee in International Law, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2021. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hull/detail.action?docID=6713322. Created from hull on 2023-04-15 11:23:45. Also UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), The Principle of Non-Refoulement as a Norm of Customary International Law. Response to the Questions Posed to UNHCR by the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany in Cases 2 BvR 1938/93, 2 BvR 1953/93, 2 BvR 1954