Amendment of Judgments

The Rationale and Jurisprudence Of Judgment Review at the Supreme Court Of Nigeria

The finality of Supreme Court judgments is fundamental to certainty in the administration of justice. As Oputa JSC famously observed in Adegoke Motors Ltd v Adesanya (1989) 13 NWLR (Pt 109) 250, ‘We are final not because we are infallible; rather we are infallible only because we are final.’ Nevertheless, the Supreme Court retains a strictly limited jurisdiction to correct accidental slips or omissions and, in exceptional circumstances, to set aside judgments affected by recognised defects such as fraud, nullity, want of jurisdiction, or fundamental procedural irregularity.

Amendment of Judgment in Nigeria: Scope, Limitations and the Courts’ Inherent Powers

Contributor: Favour Somto Nwachukwu Introduction The finality of judicial decisions is a fundamental principle in the administration of justice.[1] Once a court of competent jurisdiction has delivered its judgment and conclusively determined the dispute, the parties and the public are…

Verified by MonsterInsights