Publications

Does the Law Forbid a Lawyer from Engaging as a Property Agent? — A Deep Dive into the Case of Ukah & Ors v. Onyia & Ors

In the Nigerian legal landscape, the interplay between professional ethics and dual practice has long been a contentious issue. The case of Ukah & Ors v. Onyia & Ors (2016)[6] stands as a pivotal decision that not only tested the boundaries of a lawyer’s permissible roles but also sparked a broader debate on the sanctity of legal professionalism. At its core, the case asked a deceptively simple question: Can a lawyer legally operate as a property agent while practicing law? The answer, as the Court of Appeal elucidated, is a resounding no, but the reasoning reveals far more than a mere prohibition, it underscores the ethical and institutional imperatives that define the legal profession.

Re-Examining the Validity of Law-Firm-Signed Statements of Claim: A Critical Analysis of Olowe v. Aluko

This article critically examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Olowe & Anor v. Aluko (2025) LPELR-81320 (SC) on the validity of Statements of Claim signed in the name of a law firm rather than an individually named legal practitioner. Against the backdrop of the long-standing authority of Okafor v. Nweke, the article analyses the statutory framework of the Legal Practitioners Act and the Court’s apparent shift from strict formalism to a more purposive and pragmatic approach.

Recapitalization of Banks in Nigeria: Legal and Regulatory Compliance Issues

This article examines the evolution of bank recapitalization in Nigeria and the legal and regulatory compliance issues arising from it. It analyses the statutory powers of the Central Bank of Nigeria, the applicable legal framework, and the recurring compliance challenges faced by banks, while highlighting how recapitalization serves as both a regulatory tool for financial stability and a catalyst for sectoral reform and economic growth.

Abuse of Ex Parte Orders in Nigeria: Safeguards Against Judicial Overreach

Ex parte orders serve as urgent judicial tools intended to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm pending a full hearing. However, their increasing misuse in Nigerian courts has raised serious concerns about judicial overreach and the erosion of the constitutional right to a fair hearing. This article examines the legal nature of ex parte orders, identifies common patterns of abuse, and analyses the safeguards developed by Nigerian courts to ensure that such orders remain temporary, proportionate, and consistent with the demands of justice.

Enforcement Gaps in Nigeria’s Consumer Protection Framework: Lessons from the Nestlé Recall

The Nestlé product recall exposes major enforcement gaps in Nigeria’s consumer protection regime. Although defective products were withdrawn, effective refund and compensation mechanisms were largely absent. This reflects weak regulatory monitoring, poor distribution tracking, and limited enforcement of consumer redress under the FCCPA. As a result, recalls often prioritize public safety without ensuring economic justice for consumers.

Trending now

O.M D'Law
Understanding the 2023 Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) and Its Application in Practice for Young Lawyers
An Appraisal on the Legal Framework for Online Defamation in Nigeria
Oyetola Muyiwa Atoyebi SAN
The SEC Rules on Issuance, Offering Platforms, and Custody of Digital Assets and Their Impact on Cryptocurrency Trading in Nigeria
Thriving in the Nigerian Legal Market: Opportunities for Young Lawyers
Verified by MonsterInsights