A seller, may be a supplier or retailer and by the definition of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018, refers to a person who supplies goods and services to another person, and also to a person who sells goods or services to the consumer[10].The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018, unequivocally states that the consumer is owed a duty and thus, an enforceable right to services executed in such fashion and quality that “reasonable” persons are naturally conditioned to expect[11]. In matters of the quality of goods, the Act states that consumers have a right to products that are of satisfactory quality, in pristine working conditions, and free from unfavourable deficiencies. Thus, may conform with relevant standards set by the regulator within that sector. Furthermore, Implied warranties which are often trivialized within the scope of the various transactions are deemed sacrosanct, and all parties must kowtow to the relevant standards as to quality reflected in the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018. An unsatisfied customer has the right to return the goods within the prescribed period for manifest inconsistencies opposed to the guarantees stated. PRODUCT WARRANTY RIGHTS, HOW ENFORCED?It is pertinent to note that warranties form a crucial part of a whole, as they are an important annexure to a contract of sale for goods, and as such, may be enforced by the commencement of civil actions against the correct parties forthwith.To this end, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018, is the primary legislation that attempts to oversee and secure the rights of consumers in Nigeria. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission is mandated by the foregoing Act, to perform various functions that are in broad terms, robust protection of consumer rights, and the purview of their mandate intersects with the assurances given as to the quality of products and services[12].Also, a Buyer of a particular product that has endured misfortune, injury or harm because of the utilization of any item can submit a complaint about the review through a state board. Upon examination, assuming it is laid out that the Buyers’ right has been breached which has caused injury or misfortune to the buyer, the Board might make such move as it considers significant, notwithstanding the right of the Buyer to seek redress in a Court of competent jurisdiction. The Act accordingly gives alleviation that is supplemental to review.[13]
CONCLUSION This cursory inquiry into the nature and consequence of these identical concepts, which form the bedrock of the legal rights accruing to even the most basic commercial transactions, is an undertaking to pointedly note the ramifications of the assurances given, as to the quality of a purchased item.This attempt to give a concise description of the legal nature of these concepts is done to improve the general perception of all and sundry, on the willingness of the Courts to provide remedial relief in the event of inevitable disputes between parties. [1]Legal Information Institute, ‘Justiciability’<https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/justiciability#:~:text=Justiciability%20refers%20to%20the%20types,the%20court%20cannot%20hear%20it> Accessed on 15th March 2022[2] Ibid[3] Ibid[4] Consumer Advocacy Foundation of Nigeria, ‘Guarantee and Warranty’ (2018)<http://www.cafon.org.ng/guarantee-warranty/> Accessed on 18th March 2022[5] Ibid[6] Ibid[7]Stimmel Stimmel & Roeser, ‘The Basics of Warranties’<https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/basics-warranties>Accessed on 14th March 2022[8]Up Counsel, ‘The Difference Between Condition and Warranty in Contract Law’ <https://www.upcounsel.com/difference-between-warranty-and-condition-in-contract-law#what-is-a-warranty>Accessed on 15th March 2022[9] Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 s167 (1) a-b[10] Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 s167[11] Ibid[12] Ibid[13] Section 39(2),Section 47(1) Federal Competition and Consumer Pretection Act, 2018 Read More Articles Here.